Read Time – 10 min

There have been many words for it since it became a thing almost 20 years ago. MGTOW, mail-order brides, neomasculinity, sex tourism, bride tourism. Today its most common name is “passport bros.” I get asked about it a lot as if this is some new thing from just the past year or two. It’s odd that a lot of men on the internet don’t realize that 15 years before “passport bros” became a thing, guys like Roosh V and many others were talking to large audiences about how Western women were horrible and the only to get laid with pretty girls or to find a loyal, traditional wife was to go abroad to non-Western, emerging market countries and go date women there.

The argument hasn’t changed in about 15 years and it’s always the same. It’s summarized with these four points:

1. Western women used to be great a long time ago, but now, because of left-wing culture, Western women have become bitchy, demanding, and ugly. They’re all fat (or get fat quickly) and do gross things like get tats and piercings and shave the sides of their heads. They’re entitled and demand all kinds of things to date or have sex with them. And, of course, they’re not Christian (oh no!!!) and they’re probably feminists who vote for Democrats (oh fuck!!!).  

2. Western women aren’t loyal to men. If you get serious with them or marry them, they’ll divorce/break up with you and take half your money and all of your kids. You can’t rely on them.

3. As a Western man, you have higher SMV in poorer countries. So you could be an average-looking beta male and go sexless in the USA, Canada, or the UK, but the instant you go to the poorer parts of Eastern Europe, SE Asia, or South America, you’ll get tons of high-quality pussy just from the fact that you’re from a Western country.

4. Women in poorer countries are more traditional and loyal, just like Western women used to be in the 1950s when everything was perfect. If you settle down with a woman in one of these poorer countries, she’ll always respect your masculine authoritah, treat you like a king forever, always give you blowjobs whenever you want, be a great mother to your children, and will never, ever divorce you.

Thus, these jaded, angry, usually right-wing tradcon (or heavily leaning in that direction) Western beta males save up their pennies, buy a ticket to some poor country where, they heard on the internet, there are hot girls, and travel there with the sole purpose of either getting laid or finding a traditional girlfriend/wife.

One side views these men as just being pragmatic and smart. The other side views these men as losers.

Which side do I fall on? You can probably guess, but as always I look at these things objectively and rationally and not based on my feelings, biases, or cultural Societal Programming, at least as best as I can. Here is my view based on objective analysis.

Are The Passport Bros Right?

First, we need to examine the points above through the filter of objective reality and see if they’re factually correct. Then we can discuss what to do about it.

Passport bro point; Western women are bitchy, demanding, and ugly.

Is this factually accurate? Well, there certainly are a lot of Western women who fall into one or more of those categories. As Western civilization rapidly descends towards collapse and gets more left-wing every year, you’ll certainly have more of these women in Western countries.

The problem is that this argument doesn’t take into account how huge the Western world is. Just the USA alone has 330 million people in it. There are approximately 750 million people in the entire Western world today, meaning 375 million women. Let’s be really nice and say that a full 90% of these women are either too old, too young, too fat, too ugly, or too married to consider having sex with. That means over 37 million eligible women in the West.

Are you telling me you can’t find a few women out of 37 million who aren’t bitchy, demanding, or ugly? Of course you can. If you say you “can’t” then you’re just being irrational.

Most of my dating “career” as an Alpha Male 2.0 was in Portland, Oregon, one of the most woke, left-wing cities in North America. Yet even given that, I was able to have sex with (and a few relationships with) numerous women in the Portland/Seattle region that numbered well into the triple digits. As many of you know, I’ve tracked all of these women and my dating activity in detail on spreadsheets since 2008.

As I’ve discussed and shown many times over many years in my blogs, out of all of these WESTERN women living in the USA:

• 0% of these women were ugly.
• 90% of these women most men would consider a 7 or above on a scale from 1 to 10 in appearance.
• 0% were bitches to me.
• About 15% were bitches to other people (but not to me). I just kept those as FBs and didn’t get serious with them.
• About 18% were demanding. I kept them as FBs and/or eventually dumped them. Hilariously, most of these demanding women were either over the age of 33 or Russian, which lots of these passport bros say are better than American women(!).

So there you go. Facts.

Am I saying that the Portland/Seattle area is filled with smoking hot, friendly, complaint, traditional women? No. What I am saying is because the sample size of the region is so large (3 million people in the Portland metro area, another 4 million in the Seattle metro area) that you can easily find attractive women who aren’t bitches without a huge amount of effort.

If Western countries like the USA or UK were tiny countries with just a few hundred thousand people, then you’d have a point. But these countries are fucking massive, with millions upon millions of women to choose from, so this point is invalid.

Passport bro point; Western women don’t stick around; they will break up or divorce you eventually but many women in poor countries won’t.

The first part of this is factually accurate, as I’ve been talking about for decades. Women’s biological default is to eventually get bored with a male sexual partner, dump his ass, find a new male partner, and keep repeating this process until she gets into her mid to late fifties when she can no longer attract new men. In any free society or culture, women will do this and do this a lot. The only way to ensure this doesn’t happen is to have an authoritarian government like North Korea or an authoritarian culture like Saudi Arabia. Despite the fact that some right-wing tradcons fantasize about this kind if thing, this would cause an entirely new set of problems that most Western men wouldn’t like at all.

Better to have a free culture and society so you can do whatever you want and navigate the negatives of that as best you can, but that’s a topic for another time.

The second part of this point isn’t accurate in most regions. Most modern-day non-Western women in poorer countries leave men in droves too, when they can. Divorce rates are skyrocketing all over the non-Western world, including very traditional countries that used to have near-zero divorce rates like India and Taiwan. Divorce is super common in Latin America and is getting much more common in central and SE Asia.

Unless you’re going to move to a highly oppressive traditional culture where women have limited rights, like Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan, you’ll have to realize that the forever Disney fairytale marriage you were taught to worship is mostly a fantasy that you need to give up on (OLTR Marriage being a far superior alternative).

Passport bro point; it’s easier for Western men to get laid in many poorer countries even if they’re lower-SMV beta males in their home Western countries.

Yes, this is accurate. I’ve talked about some of these countries, like the Philippines, where Western beta males can get laid like rock stars. There are indeed many regions in the world where Western betas will get laid more easily. This is the only passport bro point that is 100% accurate to reality.

What’s The Best Approach Then?

After all of that analysis, here’s my view on this.

If you live in or near a big Western city and the only reason you’re going to take the trouble to fly to another country is to hopefully have sex with girls from that country, then you’re being a loser in my opinion. Here are the reasons why:

1. For a similar amount of effort and cost you could find a few attractive, nice girls in your city to have sex with without having to spend hundreds/thousands of dollars on travel costs to fly 3,000 miles away to do the same thing.

2. If you expend this time, effort, and cost on flying to a distant land just to get laid, what kind of message is that sending to your subconscious and self-esteem? You’re saying to yourself, “I’m such a big loser that women in my own country won’t have sex with me, so the only way I can have sex is by spending hundreds/thousands of dollars flying to this shithole country 3,000 miles away.” Not only is that not true, but it’s going to reinforce an extremely damaging message to your subconscious which will not make you happy.

3. In my opinion, you should be able to get laid anywhere in the world (with perhaps the one proviso that you speak the language there, though even that isn’t an excuse since I’ve had sex with several women who didn’t speak English, and that includes non-sugar daddy game).

Therefore, you should do what I did; get good at having sex with attractive Western women, then when you do go to other countries, it’s that much easier. Now you can get laid anywhere on the planet. Isn’t that much better than “only” being able to get laid in little isolated regions?

I’ve had lots of sex with lots of women in other countries. Indeed, in the last several years since moving out of the Collapsing USA pretty much 95% of all the women I’ve had sex with were non-Americans and had strong foreign accents (or didn’t speak English at all). I’ve also said that if my wife, Pink Firefly died tomorrow and I eventually married someone else, this new woman would not be an American. Not because I think American women are bad (I like American women for the most part) but because that’s just not the world I live in anymore.

So clearly I’m not saying foreign women are bad. They’re fucking great! Having sex with a smoking hot Latina girl who lives in South America or a ultra-pretty Asian girl who lives in Asia is an amazing experience, quite unlike having sex with a Western woman, and I highly recommend it.

But I have never, in my entire life, flown to a country just to have sex with women there. I always visit my countries for five flags reasons: business, banking, taxes, logistics, paperwork, and so on. And while I’m there I’ll “sample the local cuisine” if I have the time.

I mean, shit, I have an entire harem of women in Paraguay, but the first time I went to Paraguay I had zero intention of having any sex there because I didn’t even know I’d like the women there. I went there for other reasons.

The healthiest view on dating, marrying, or having sex with foreign women is to do so as an enjoyable supplement to your international lifestyle. For all the reasons above, you shouldn’t make it the only reason.

Question of The Week: Unhappiness Means You Don’t Have What You Want Yet?

To have your question featured here where I will write an entire article addressing it, click here. You will always remain anonymous.

CR Writes:

Hey in ur prev livestream u stated that Elon Musk and Tate are “Not Happy”… Do u have any info that causes u 2 disagree with my MEGA GENIUS opinion/POV on “Happiness” below?

An interesting thought I had:

Let’s say “Unhappiness” = “Expected Achievement-Actual Achievement”…..so the “amount ur Unhappy” is Exactly = to “how much u’ve underachieved, relative 2 what u believe u can achieve”.

Elon and Tate are ‘Not Happy’ in the sense they have Brainwashed themselves that they can achieve so much more than what they currently have…..therefore the delta of “Expected Achievement-Actual Achievement’ is very large…..therefore “Unhappiness” is Very Large.

Caleb is “Happy” in the sense that he has brainwashed himself that he can’t achieve very much more than what he has currently achieved….therefore the delta of “Expected Achievement-Actual Achievement” is very small…..therefore “Unhappiness” is very small.

(Maybe this explains why poor people can still be happy^^: “Well yeah I don’t have much, but I never expected to have much anyways”….therefore “Expected Achievement-Actual Achievement” = Small = Unhappiness Small”.

The problem 4 Caleb comes in when he realizes he can achieve so much more than he has currently achieved…..he can become President of the US….he can become President of Dubai…..he can create new Planets…..he can create new universes.

This would skyrocket “Expected Achievement” upward for Caleb, and, since “Current Achievement” would remain the same for him in that moment…….his “Unhappiness” from that moment onward would skyrocket as well…….well, it would skyrocket until he took steps to close that gap between ‘Current Achievement’ and ‘Expected Achievement’.

So Caleb must continually brainwash himself that “Yup, my current situation is basically the max I can achieve (while still striving each day for small amount more progress towards the upper limit of his expected achievement for himself)”….this is the only way he can maintain his current state of “Small Unhappiness”….aka “Large Happiness”.

I actually believe the derivation above is the correct answer^^…..

…and now it’s making me question whether all of Caleb’s teachings of “Long-Term, Consistent Masculine Happiness” are Incorrect…..bc (from the derivation above^^) “Long-Term, Consistent Masculine Happiness” can only happen if the man mentally handicaps/lobotomizes himself and what he believes he can achieve.

You’re possibly correct on the very first point you made and are completely, utterly wrong on everything else you said.

I think that a big difference between your current condition and an achievable improved condition could cause someone unhappiness. It also could create dissatisfaction that would be important for motivation and drive, which some would consider a positive. But I agree the delta between these two conditions could cause unhappiness.

Now here’s where you’re wrong on everything else.

1. I do not believe, in any way whatsoever, that everything I’ve achieved up until now is all I’m able to achieve. I know for a fact that I could be a billionaire, both right now and in the future, and I’m speaking literally. I know for a fact that I could go have sex with A-list celebrity women, and again, I’m being literal. I know for a fact that I could get down to 9% body fat. And so on. I have the ability to do these things.

Yet I have done none of these things, will never do these things (other than maybe the celebrity one; not sure about that), and I’m one of the happiest men I know.

I have no idea where you got it in your head that I believe I have maxed out my current life condition. If that were true I would have retired a long time ago. Instead, I’m doing literally the opposite; I’ve doubled down and am working extremely hard on a few financial goals that are far beyond my current condition. These are goals I know I can hit, and I’m still a few years away from them.

2. I know exactly why Andrew Tate is unhappy. It’s not because he thinks he can literally become God or a billionaire or President of the World and he hasn’t yet. It’s because he’s an extreme Alpha Male 1.0 who has a precise view of how the world, men, women, and society should be, and it’s not that way at all. Because he’s massively outcome dependent, this reality drives him fucking insane and makes him very unhappy.

It’s the same with men like Jordan Peterson, many hardcore tradcon Christians, and even many hardcore socialists. The world is the opposite of the way they think it should be, and since they really give a shit about every little detail about the whole world (massive outcome dependence) instead of their own lives, they can never be happy.

3. I don’t precisely know why Elon Musk is unhappy but I’m pretty sure most of it is related to a very long history of being unhappy (horrible, abusive childhood) and having some real mental problems (Aspergers/Autism, etc). His achievement delta might be a factor but it’s certainly not the biggest one.

So no, you can be very happy even though you know you haven’t maxed out your achievement. Many would make the opposite argument; that striving toward a new achievement is the very essence of long-term happiness.