Reading Time – 4 minutes

One of the most confusing parts of modern dating is trying to understand why certain relationships feel effortless… while others blow up like nuclear bombs on day three. If you’ve spent any time navigating the collapsing Western dating landscape of the 2020s, you already know the old rules don’t apply. Men behave differently, women behave differently, and the cultural shift has produced three clear categories of men — and three loosely corresponding types of women.

These categories aren’t perfect mirrors of each other, but they do explain most modern relationship dynamics: why some couples are naturally harmonious, why some implode instantly, and why others look fine on paper but fall apart within weeks.

FYI these terms are not BDSM terminology — this is Alpha Male 2.0 terminology, so forget any BDSM meanings that pop into your head as you read these.

The Three Types of Women

1. The Dominant Woman

The dominant woman needs to make the major relationship decisions. She’s the one who tells you where you’re going on the first date, what time it’s happening, what the plan is afterward, and why it makes sense. She leads. She decides. She has a specific agenda for her life and the relationship, and she expects you to fall in line.

In the Western world today, this is the majority of women — roughly 60% and rising — thanks to the “girlboss” era and cultural programming that celebrates control, authority, and micromanagement. Dominants aren’t necessarily masculine, but they behave like the “alpha male 1.0” equivalent on the female side.

2. The Submissive Woman

A submissive woman is the opposite of a dominant. She does not want to make major decisions. It makes her uncomfortable. She wants preferences, involvement, and emotional input… but she doesn’t want authority.

A submissive woman prefers a man who leads, who has a plan, who provides structure. She’s often more feminine than the other types, but that comes with tradeoffs: submissive women can be needier, more emotional, and more dependent. They want safety and direction, not control.

3. The Independent Woman

The independent woman is strong, busy, and self-directed — but unlike the dominant, she doesn’t need to boss men around. She doesn’t care what you do because she’s too focused on her own life. She’s in school, she’s working, she’s on teams, she has hobbies, friends, family obligations — you practically have to schedule an appointment just to see her.

She’s not submissive and she’s not controlling. She’s simply absorbed in her own mission. Independents are often the most masculine of the three because their lifestyle mirrors that of a man with purpose.

Every type has pros and cons. Dominants can be exciting but exhausting. Submissives can be soft but emotionally intense. Independents can be fun and drama-free but hard to pin down.

And contrary to popular belief, there is no such thing as an alpha female 2.0. Women are fundamentally outcome-dependent in relationships, no matter how strong they are. The closest thing to that ideal is the independent woman — but even she doesn’t replicate the male 2.0 model.

How These Types Match with Different Men

Now for the fun part: what happens when each type of woman gets into a relationship with each type of man? Here’s the short version of the chart described in the video:

Dominant Woman + Beta Male

This is the standard Western couple. She’s in charge. He obeys. It’s harmonious enough but filled with medium-level drama. She will cheat if the relationship lasts long enough. He often knows but tolerates it because he’s attached and fearful of losing her.

Independent Woman + Beta Male

Harmonious… but very short-lived. She gets bored. She leaves. Sometimes she cheats, but usually she simply exits.

Submissive Woman + Beta Male

Dysfunctional. Both are passive. She eventually ends up taking the lead out of necessity, then resents the hell out of him for it. Cheating is common because she no longer respects him.

Dominant Woman + Alpha Male 1.0

Chaos. Nuclear explosions. They both want to be the general and neither will surrender. Usually ends after one terrible date.

Independent Woman + Alpha Male 1.0

Short relationship. She won’t tolerate his rules or need for control. She leaves as soon as he tries to dictate her life.

Submissive Woman + Alpha Male 1.0

This pairing works fairly well, at least externally. He leads, she follows. Medium levels of drama. He definitely cheats — and assumes she’ll tolerate it. Whether she does depends on her tolerance and self-esteem.

Dominant Woman + Alpha Male 2.0

Impossible. A dominant will sniff out an alpha 2.0 immediately and realize she can’t control him. She won’t tolerate that. The best an alpha 2.0 can do is see her casually as an FB — while she bosses around her boyfriend.

Independent Woman + Alpha Male 2.0

Almost perfect. Low drama, harmonious, long-term potential. She doesn’t tell him what to do; he doesn’t tell her what to do. They live separate lives and enjoy each other.

Submissive Woman + Alpha Male 2.0

Also, harmonious and low drama. The alpha 2.0 has to take a little more initiative, but this pairing works beautifully. Both roles fit naturally.

Modern dating confusion becomes far easier to navigate once you understand these three categories. Pay attention to the type of woman you consistently attract and the type you tend to pursue — they’re often not the same. And most importantly, understand how your own category as a man shapes the outcomes you keep experiencing.

When you know the type of woman in front of you — dominant, submissive, or independent — the entire relationship dynamic becomes predictable. And once it’s predictable, it’s manageable.

Or avoidable.

AI did NOT write this article. The article comes 100% from me and is 100% my content. However, AI was used to transcribe this content from some of my other social media which is why the voice is a little different. It’s still 100% my content and not written by AI. AI will never “write” my content!  Remember that you can always go to calebjonesblog.com and subscribe to my Substack if you want articles physically written by me with no AI involvement whatsoever.